1
Anonymous
@soapbox
01 Sep 2011 5:59PM
• 3,259 views • 3 attachments

Solyndra, a company that got $500,000,000.00 in stimulus money from taxpayers via Obama went bankrupt this month, leaving taxpayers on the hook for millions more.

Allentown Metal Works, touted by Obama in 2009 speeches as a beneficiary of his "stimulus plan" went bankrupt this year as well.

We're now seeing these and hundreds of other companies that were cherry picked by Obama, many rewarded because they supported him in some way, now dying off like every other company is in the Obama economy.

With the real jobless rate according to Daily Bail nearing twenty two percent (22% !!), which includes unemployed who have exhausted their benefits, when is this Administration going to learn that government through high taxes does not provide jobs? When will they learn that less regulation & lower taxes, spurring growth from the public and from companies are what stimulates the free enterprise system and creates jobs? When will they learn? With a dedicated failfag socialist like Obama & those around him who think they already know everything....the answer is likely NEVER.

Obama, welcome to your 1-term Jimmy Carter legacy....you've earned it!

reply favorite add to gallery permalink Share
Quote Strike
Anonymous
Anonymous
note, attachments may take a moment to show up.

Replies 69

1
Anonymous
01 Sep 2011 6:06PM

Solyndra was a double whammy because in addition to the stimulus it got, it was a SOLAR PANEL manufacturer!!! So much for "green energy" the the trillions that have been wasted on it. The taxpayer funded Chevy Volt will probably be next since they sold 125 last month worldwide (Nat'l legal and policy center).

It would all be funny if it weren't so pathetic.

reply permalink parent Share
Quote Strike
Anonymous
Anonymous
note, attachments may take a moment to show up.
1
Anonymous
01 Sep 2011 7:31PM

The jews that ran those companies took the money and ran back to Israel. If there's any justice, those kikes will die when a righteous Arab runs into a cafe with them in it and suicide bombs the place.

reply permalink parent Share
Quote Strike
Anonymous
Anonymous
note, attachments may take a moment to show up.
1
Anonymous
01 Sep 2011 11:57PM

So one company failed under Obama's approach. When Bush lowered taxes and cut regulation the entire fucking economy went to shit. Are you that fucking slow that you still don't get it, or are you just angry about having a small dick and a black p********?

reply permalink parent Share
Quote Strike
Anonymous
Anonymous
note, attachments may take a moment to show up.
1
Anonymous
02 Sep 2011 3:32AM

^Just like Obama thinking there's "57 states", you don't seem to be able to count.^ Or is it that you just can't read? OP listed TWO (2) businesses, not one, with hundreds of others that have failed with Obama's government intervention that can easily be found with a search on google.

Don't you listen to the news, or read a newspaper? Dozens & dozens of these company failures are listed every momth! You haven't noticed that unemployment was 7.6% when Obama took office (according to wordpress.com), and it is now 9.2% (New York Times, Fox News) after spending trillions on Obama's "stimulus"? Are you a moron or just an ideologue that refuses to face the fact that government ruins, it doesn't stimulate.

reply permalink parent Share
Quote Strike
Anonymous
Anonymous
note, attachments may take a moment to show up.
1
Anonymous
02 Sep 2011 4:10AM

Just love the libtard that actually believes that cutting regulations and lowering taxes makes the economy "go to shit"! LMFAO

Barney Frank, democrat represntative, forced Fammie Mae & Freddie Mac to make home loans to losers that couldn't afford it with legislation that he, Maxine Waters (democrat), and other liberal democrats pushed through when they had the majority in the House and Senate.

When these junk loans started being foreclosed on, it sent the economy into a tailspin, forcing banks to close and causing the recession that we still aren't out of today. Instead of posting your liberal feelings like they're truth, why don't you do what OP and other conservative posters have done here and post FACTS along with the SOURCES where they're found? What's that? You won't because then you'd have to post the thruth instead?

Since you libtards don't seem to be able to read, count, or do any research, I've done it for you. Here is a source that describes exactly what Barney Frank's roll was in bringing down the economy...oh yeah, Frank also got his male lover a job at Fannie Mae too...talk about utter corruption:

http://americaswatchtower.com/2008/09/17/barney-frank-and-chuck-schumers-role-the-fannie-mae-failure/

reply permalink parent Share
Quote Strike
Anonymous
Anonymous
note, attachments may take a moment to show up.
1
Anonymous
06 Sep 2011 5:27PM

Freedie Mae and Mac were a tiny portion of the bad loans. Most were unregulated loans for big homes to middle class white people. Sorry, you can't blame Obama and the poor darkies for that one.

Herbert Hoover supply side, deregulation = Great Depression.
George W. Bush supply side, deregulation = Great Recession.

Slow learner? Turn off Fox State Televesion and get deprogrammed from your brainwashing.

reply permalink parent Share
Quote Strike
Anonymous
Anonymous
note, attachments may take a moment to show up.
1
Anonymous
06 Sep 2011 8:15PM

^It's not Freedie Maie and Mac, it's FANNIE MAE & FREDDIE MAC, you retard! And they weren't "a portion of the loans", they're the backed by the Feds to guaruntee the loans.

Typical liberal = an uneducated moron that doesn't know the first thing about what he's talking about, but just regurgitates the horse shit he hears off MSNBC.

Hoover nor Bush were "supply siders"...do you even know what that means?

Barney Frank & Maxine Waters, democrats in the House, forced through regulation when Democrats took over 5 years ago that forced Mac & Mae to back bad loans to low income borrowers, causing banks to go bust and causing this financial mess. THOSE ARE THE FACTS....try reading a history book and listening something that you don't agree with for a change...then you may not sound like such a fucking imbecile.

....talk about brainwashing? Sheesh!!

reply permalink parent Share
Quote Strike
Anonymous
Anonymous
note, attachments may take a moment to show up.
1
Anonymous
20 Sep 2011 5:57PM

chill-lax dude

reply permalink parent Share
Quote Strike
Anonymous
Anonymous
note, attachments may take a moment to show up.
1
Anonymous
02 Sep 2011 6:31AM

Ya because under Reagan the government did not expand. Stupid fuckers.

reply permalink parent Share
Quote Strike
Anonymous
Anonymous
note, attachments may take a moment to show up.
1
Anonymous
02 Sep 2011 2:32PM

The point is that the private sector, i.e. the sector that provides JOBS, GROWTH, & WEALTH, grew much faster with Pres. Reagan.

Libtards refuse to learn because they're so into their own ideology. Stating your feeling as if they're fact isn't going to re-write history, you failfags. LOL

reply permalink parent Share
Quote Strike
Anonymous
Anonymous
note, attachments may take a moment to show up.
1
Anonymous
02 Sep 2011 6:49AM

OP. stfu. Obama ftw.

reply permalink parent Share
Quote Strike
Anonymous
Anonymous
note, attachments may take a moment to show up.
1
Anonymous
02 Sep 2011 2:34PM

^Welfare and food stamp recipient^....don't disturb his "free" gov't programs!

reply permalink parent Share
Quote Strike
Anonymous
Anonymous
note, attachments may take a moment to show up.
1
Anonymous
02 Sep 2011 7:00AM

It's going to take more than one term of any p********, Rep or Dem, to dig us all out of the shit, Bush's administration and the irresponsible lending of the US' institutional investment banking spivs left the Western world's interrelated economies in, three years ago.

Rep. were in charge of the practices at the time and therefore have to shoulder the blame and neither they, nor the dem's, have a quick fix, one-size-fits-all solution.

True Americans could start by prosecuting the banks for irresponsible practices, legislate new restrictions that refocus them as places of security and strength rather than money making machines built like a house of cards, and hit their high-risk/high-reward gambling practices with a social responsibility tax to reward and pay debt to the democracy and its people for creating the capitalist market on which it feeds.

In the recovery years to come, one way or another, alot of people are going to get hurt, a few of the rich and many of the poor - Dem's and Rep's, you're all in this together and you'll get out of it together if you work together.
Go USA!

reply permalink parent Share
Quote Strike
Anonymous
Anonymous
note, attachments may take a moment to show up.
1
Anonymous
02 Sep 2011 2:47PM

^Incorrect^, as the poster said above it was Barney Frank (democrat), Maxine Waters (democrat), Harry Reide (democrat), Nancy Pelosi (democrat), that all pushed for the relaxed rules on mortgage lending when they had the majority that created the financial failure. There is no disputing that, & you can read the article that the poster sourced above for the proof.

Totally incorrect that Republicans were in charge of the practices, as they were in the minority in the House and Senate at the time. You are totally incorrect factually.

Incorrect Americans could prosecute the banks as it was the Congress 5 years ago that changed the rules and set the catasrophe in place. Stating you feelings as if they are facts, sir, does not make them so. You really need to read up on this subject and educate yourself, rather then sounding like a hack from MSNBC.

Yes indeed people are going to need to cut back in order for a recovery to happen. As in Greece, the U.K., and other countries, the USA is going to have to roll back all of the social and give away programs that we've gotten both the wealthy and the poor addicted to over the last 75 years.

If we don't control our borders and make people work for a days pay like we used to 100 years ago, the USA is doomed to a riots, and a fate like we've been seeing in lesser countries around the world.

reply permalink parent Share
Quote Strike
Anonymous
Anonymous
note, attachments may take a moment to show up.
1
Anonymous
02 Sep 2011 8:27AM

Solyndra failed because our companies undercut their prices by 50%.

reply permalink parent Share
Quote Strike
Anonymous
Anonymous
note, attachments may take a moment to show up.
1
Anonymous
05 Sep 2011 6:06PM

Socialists/Communists pay their workers nothing, subsidize the cost of manufacturing then go into a capitalist country that pays its workers properly and undercuts the prices by half or more. Then when they run the capitalists out of business, they take over and triple the prices so only the elitists can afford the products.

Which makes one wonder why any working wage person would be a socialist / liberal / democrat / communist, since they suffer most under that kind of system, doesn't it?

reply permalink parent Share
Quote Strike
Anonymous
Anonymous
note, attachments may take a moment to show up.
1
Anonymous
05 Sep 2011 6:12PM

Communists / Socialists pay workers nothing & subsidize the cost of manufacturing goods so they can go in and undercut prices in capitalists countries. They put private, capitalist businesses out of business & take over, then triple the prices for their shoddy goods that only the elite can then affort to buy.

It makes you wonder why any working class person would support socialists / liberals / communists / democrats who history shows oppresses and exploits them, doesn't it?

reply permalink parent Share
Quote Strike
Anonymous
Anonymous
note, attachments may take a moment to show up.
1
Anonymous
05 Sep 2011 6:14PM

Sorry for the double post...Motherless went offline, then came back on with a double post :(

reply permalink parent Share
Quote Strike
Anonymous
Anonymous
note, attachments may take a moment to show up.
1
Anonymous
06 Sep 2011 2:20AM

Yep, anyone that's spent 5 mins on Motherless today has gotten that idiotic "oops" page.

reply permalink parent Share
Quote Strike
Anonymous
Anonymous
note, attachments may take a moment to show up.
1
Anonymous
07 Sep 2011 5:07AM

The rich in this country have had their tax breaks that they have been whining about for nearly 10 years. Where are the jobs? The republicans have gotten everything they want in terms of taxes for 10 years. We have been losing jobs for 10 years. Multi billion dollar companies have been firing americans and shipping those jobs over seas, while getting tax breaks or paying no taxes at all. Tax breaks for the rich millionaires don't work. They don't create jobs, they just keep the money. Most of them are greedy fucks, how can there possibly be anyone left that STILL doesn't realize this?

reply permalink parent Share
Quote Strike
Anonymous
Anonymous
note, attachments may take a moment to show up.
1
Anonymous
08 Sep 2011 9:20PM

"The rich in this country have had their tax breaks that they have been whining about for nearly 10 years. Where are the jobs?"

Answer: First of all, when you have the government taking over companies like GM, and then telling the stockholders, many of which are retirees that have owned stock for 30, 40, 50 years, that they're aren't going to get a cent for it & then give the company over to the labor unions....you're not going to find the "rich" so eager to invest their money.

Secondly there's one very important thing you don't seem to understand: It's OUR money, it's NOT THE GOVERNMENTS MONEY! You act like taxpayers are getting tax breaks as "favors". The government isn't doing taxpayers a favor when its giving them back more of their own money!

It's really a laugh, all of you people out there that live off of government programs, want something for nothing, and don't want be responsible, pay your own way, & simply be left alone like the rest of us do. It's not greedy to want to keep more of YOUR OWN MONEY! And if you socialist losers don't like that, there are plenty of countries like Cuba, Venezuela, and North Korea where they well "take care of you" from cradle to grave!

reply permalink parent Share
Quote Strike
Anonymous
Anonymous
note, attachments may take a moment to show up.
1
Anonymous
09 Sep 2011 12:55AM

The government bailed out GM, and it's still privately owned. And the retirees
you speak of are members of the labor union (United Auto Workers)and are getting
their pensions that the union negotiated. It's corporate management that wants
to screw them out of their pensions.

And who's really "living off government programs?" Could it be Goldman Sachs,
Bank of America, Morgan Stanley, and other financial institutions who would have
gone belly up had the government(starting with Bush and continuing with Obama)
not come to their rescue? Could it be defense contractors who get billions for
useless weapons systems? Could it be agri-business who get government subsidies
for corn, sugar and other commodities? The trouble with you right wing pussies
is that you don't have the balls to fight the powers that be. You'd rather pick
on some poor mope collecting a measly welfare check than stand up to some rich
fuck who's stealing billions of your tax dollars. You're pathetic.

reply permalink parent Share
Quote Strike
Anonymous
Anonymous
note, attachments may take a moment to show up.
1
Anonymous
09 Sep 2011 1:12AM

^You really should know what the hell you're talking about before you post. GM is owned by the US Goverment, labor unions, and this year started issuing stock again. If you don't know how to use Google to find this out, go to the G.A.O. website & find out there, Einstein. Post facts instead of what you think, idiot.

Well, with 1 in 4 Americans getting Food Stamps thanks to Obama's ruination of our economy, I would say its people taking government handouts. And yes, banks did take taxpayer funded welfare too....after Obama offered it to them! I hate to respond to factless posts like yours with information and facts. Why is it all the shit that your whining about is caused by the very left-wing socialists that you try to defend?

We have a free-enterprise system here in the USA (if you don't know what that is, Google it). A defense contractor offers a product that the US Gov,'t puts out for bid. If they win the bid, they get the contract. See how that works, dipshit? Or would you prefer that we throw stones and call terrorists names?

Your simplistic, uneducated, and idealistic view of the world is what's pathetic. And what's even more pathetic is libtard failfags like you get to vote. Your ignorance and others like you are exact reason why the USA has been run by moron liberals for the last 5 years, why they've put us in the fucking mess we're in now.

reply permalink parent Share
Quote Strike
Anonymous
Anonymous
note, attachments may take a moment to show up.
1
Anonymous
09 Sep 2011 2:50AM

Holy shit, it amazes me how many liberals are just factually inaccurate & have no knowledge of history whatsoever, yet act all outraged at correct, fact based posts! Unbelievable.

reply permalink parent Share
Quote Strike
Anonymous
Anonymous
note, attachments may take a moment to show up.
1
Anonymous
09 Sep 2011 10:27PM

...it's what happens when they know they're going to get their asses kicked in the next election the same way they did in the last one. It's called FEAR!

reply permalink parent Share
Quote Strike
Anonymous
Anonymous
note, attachments may take a moment to show up.
1
Anonymous
10 Sep 2011 1:18AM
upload deleted
reply permalink parent Share
Quote Strike
Anonymous
Anonymous
note, attachments may take a moment to show up.
1
Anonymous
10 Sep 2011 2:49PM

^typical liberal response^

reply permalink parent Share
Quote Strike
Anonymous
Anonymous
note, attachments may take a moment to show up.
1
Anonymous
11 Sep 2011 9:43PM

Is anyone actually surprised that a crook like Obama who has associated himself with the likes of mobster Tony Resko, domestic terrorist Bill Ayers, and convicted Governor Blagovich, would pay back the groups who helped him get elected? You know, like the Union bosses, the green movement, the trial lawyers, and on and on the corruption goes....

reply permalink parent Share
Quote Strike
Anonymous
Anonymous
note, attachments may take a moment to show up.
1
Anonymous
13 Sep 2011 8:29PM

My answer makes no sense to you because you believe what you want to believe and any answer that proves otherwise is ignored by people like you. Even my 5th grade nephew knows when I asked him, "Danny, did labor unions have more members in the 1940's or now?" He said, "I think 1940's".

Debating is about facts. Even a 5th grade kid knows that unions have the fewest members now more then ever because manufacturing jobs have gone down and tech jobs have gone up, thus making unions obsolete. If you don't even know this you're wasting everyone's time, including mine. Why don't you shut off MSNBC, pick up a book that doesn't agree with your tiny, myopic view of the world, and learn something for once?

And again, you're factually wrong. Democrats wrote, pushed, and instituted the laws forcing banks to lend to unqualified people when they had the majority in the House and the Senate, not Repubs. That is FACT, and there has been a link posted above that in your haste to post your idiotic beliefs that you have obviously ignorned. Go to that link, read it, do some research on Google. The proof is there, but as your usual ignorant way will I'm sure dictate, you'll ignore it and simply remain an ignoramus.

This is why we have a total failfag for a Pres. and why banks have gone out of business left and right with millions of people that have been foreclosed upon because of ignoramuses like this guy. Totally fucking pathetic.

reply permalink parent Share
Quote Strike
Anonymous
Anonymous
note, attachments may take a moment to show up.
1
Anonymous
15 Sep 2011 10:03PM

And here's the punch line, the process to loan to Solyandra was begun under the Bush administration.

reply permalink parent Share
Quote Strike
Anonymous
Anonymous
note, attachments may take a moment to show up.
1
Anonymous
16 Sep 2011 2:02AM

The loan application for Solyandra WAS STOPPED under the Bush administration. Are you a fucking liar, or just a total ignoramus? You libtards have no shame whatsoever...you'll say anything, lie, mis-quote, and re-write history to demean those you don't agree with and try to brainwash the simple minded to your point of view. You're really pathetic, asshole.

reply permalink parent Share
Quote Strike
Anonymous
Anonymous
note, attachments may take a moment to show up.
1
Anonymous
16 Sep 2011 2:28AM

With 4 visits to the Obama White House by Solyndra execs just days before their 5 HUNDRED MILLION DOLLAR loan was rushed through, and then breaking news that Solyndra was a contributor to the Obama Pres. campaign, it just makes me laugh that the liberal democrat posters are trying to diver the subject to talking about labor unions, George Bush, General Motors....anything but how totally corrupt Obama and his White House is.

Right now, according to Fox News, CNN, & ABC, this crooked Solyndra deal is being investigated by the FBI, a Congressional hearing, California law enforcement, and various other law enforcement agencies. Jay Carney in today's press briefing tried to cover up by lying, stating that Solyndra has no ties to the White House. *SNIFF-SNIFF*....hmmm, smells like Watergate up in here. And not a peep from Eric Holder and the Justice Dept....as Gomer used to say, "SURPRISE, SURPRISE, SURPRISE!!!!"

In any event, democrats & liberals really seem to have a taste for the corruption, with support of Obama, Blogovich, Holder, trade unions, and on, and on. It's gonna be a fun election next year!

reply permalink parent Share
Quote Strike
Anonymous
Anonymous
note, attachments may take a moment to show up.
1
Anonymous
17 Sep 2011 4:40PM

This came out Friday on CNN & Fox News...four "green energy" companies that took "stimulus" money have gone broke and left U.S. taxpayers holding the bag for BILLIONS! It's not just Solyndra.

How much longer are we going to let these moronic liberals and greenfag environmentalists preach this global-warming bullshit and push this totally failed "green energy"?? WAKE UP AMERICA...we have billions of gallons of oil located right in our own country!!!

reply permalink parent Share
Quote Strike
Anonymous
Anonymous
note, attachments may take a moment to show up.
1
Anonymous
18 Sep 2011 4:37AM

because we're too scared of bears.

reply permalink parent Share
Quote Strike
Anonymous
Anonymous
note, attachments may take a moment to show up.
1
Anonymous
18 Sep 2011 4:42AM

Green energy hasn't failed. There are companies and/or types of the whole going green thing that have done well. You have to take into account the shitty economy, everyone is doing poorly, except the oil companies of course.

What I want to know though, for the people who keep pushing oil oil oil, which isn't going to lower prices on gas fyi if they do more drilling, what happens when we run out of oil? Not one of you have come up with an idea of what we do after that. Thats why the whole 'green movement' thing is going on. So we can get other sources of energy up and running BEFORE we run out.

reply permalink parent Share
Quote Strike
Anonymous
Anonymous
note, attachments may take a moment to show up.
1
Anonymous
18 Sep 2011 3:20PM

"Green energy hasn't failed."

LMAO, have you read ANY of the posts in this thread? Do you listen to the news... or read a newspaper? Or are you just so brainwashed that you refuse to believe facts when their placed in front of your fat head?

Every country runs on electricity, coal, and oil...not solar, wind, & bean sprouts, despite the fact that trillions in taxpayer money have been simply given to them! It's idiots like you that force the rest of us to relive the failures of the past over and over again...you just seem unable to learn from history or are likely just ignorant of it.

reply permalink parent Share
Quote Strike
Anonymous
Anonymous
note, attachments may take a moment to show up.
1
Anonymous
18 Sep 2011 2:03PM

all politicans screw the people... it's not just his dumbass... you can't trust any of them to do the rigth thing for the people they supposedly serve, only for their friends. etc.

reply permalink parent Share
Quote Strike
Anonymous
Anonymous
note, attachments may take a moment to show up.
1
Anonymous
18 Sep 2011 3:34PM

To the poster a few posts up that thinks we're going to run out of oil soon:

The KNOWN oil reserves of the planet are 1.1 trillion and 1.3 trillion barrels (source: Scientific American - http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=squeezing-more-oil ) This DOES NOT include the oil fields we have not yet discovered.

Now its obvious from you libtards and eco-fags based on all of your other posts that you'll choose to remain ignorant rather then educate yourselves and read the above study, since it completely disproves and ruins your arguments for your "green energy" faggotry.

Your biggest enemy is the truth, because then Americans and Europeans will demand that all the funding for your bullshit junk environmentalism will be stopped. You guys are the biggest bunch of douchebags on the planet.

reply permalink parent Share
Quote Strike
Anonymous
Anonymous
note, attachments may take a moment to show up.
1
Anonymous
18 Sep 2011 4:13PM

I've seen figures like this also from Bloomberg, Fox News, Wall Street Journal, and even the New York Times. BTW, that translates into over 100 years worth of fuel, and thats only from the oil fields we know about at this moment!

Ignorance is bliss with environmentalists and the far left.

reply permalink parent Share
Quote Strike
Anonymous
Anonymous
note, attachments may take a moment to show up.
1
Anonymous
18 Sep 2011 8:56PM

So your argument ignoring all other sources and just going off of the link you posted is that we're running out of oil in 30-40 years but we aren't really running out because technology that doesn't currently exist will be invented and more well will be found despite companies like Shell, Exxon, and Chevron saying that they are already have a pretty complete map of all major untapped oil reserves and those reserves are included in the 30-40 year estimate that they themselves support as being accurate. You then go on to expand this to that cleaner better forms of energy should be completely abandoned in favor of continuing to use oil since we're not running out because new technology will be invented that doesn't currently exist that will stop us from running out.

Ignoring the absurdity of abandoning alternative technologies on the assumption that these currently non existent savior oil technologies will be invented before we run out of oil. Why would we not want to use a cleaner healthier source of energy? Oil is bad for people period. There is nothing safe or healthy about any petroleum products used in any manner including power, vehicles, plastics, everything none of them are safe or healthy for a sustainable environment. So why would you even want to argue in favor of not cutting down their use regardless of if we're running out or not?

reply permalink parent Share
Quote Strike
Anonymous
Anonymous
note, attachments may take a moment to show up.
1
Anonymous
19 Sep 2011 3:35AM

You have to post some sources, you have to post some facts before they can be ignored, idiot. How many times does this need to be said over and over again? This is the problem with libards, they post, they talk, and they never listen, nor learn.

Once again you blather on about your beliefs as if they're fact. THEY'RE NOT, they're only WHAT YOU THINK. Post facts with the source from which they came or STFU with your drivel and quit wasting our time!!!

reply permalink parent Share
Quote Strike
Anonymous
Anonymous
note, attachments may take a moment to show up.
-8
Mrblackman
View posts View profile
20 Sep 2011 2:28PM

Here is your post.http://www.irthebest.com/Environmental_problems_petroleum.html

reply permalink parent Share
Quote Strike
Anonymous
Anonymous
note, attachments may take a moment to show up.
1
Anonymous
18 Sep 2011 11:43PM

Because republicans are retarded thats why. They go on and on about "God's green earth" while wanting to kill every single living thing on earth that isn't human. If we let the republicans have their way then earth would look like mars.

reply permalink parent Share
Quote Strike
Anonymous
Anonymous
note, attachments may take a moment to show up.
1
Anonymous
19 Sep 2011 3:41AM

^Idiots like this that never open a book, but just vote based on what they're told^ to believe are why we have a Pres. that's given us $4 gas prices, record foreclosures, put us trillions in debt, over 9% unemployment, a credit crisis, 25-45% increase in grocery prices, and added a 3rd war on top of it all.

And Republicans are the retarded ones? LMAO, they're the only ones who post here with facts and also list the sources where the facts come from. Libards fail again!

reply permalink parent Share
Quote Strike
Anonymous
Anonymous
note, attachments may take a moment to show up.
1
Anonymous
18 Sep 2011 11:46PM

just kill the jews

reply permalink parent Share
Quote Strike
Anonymous
Anonymous
note, attachments may take a moment to show up.
2
Anonymous
19 Sep 2011 6:30AM

OP, you want to criticize our current p******** on his spending.
Where were you when Bush borrowed more money from foreign sources than the previous 42 p********s combined?
Where were you when over 10 billion dollars in cash just disappeared in Iraq?
Where were you when lack of oversight and regulations from the Bush Administration caused US Citizens to lose 12 trillion dollars in investments, retirement, and home values?
Where were you when Bush rang up 10 trillion dollars in combined budget and current account deficits?
Where were you when Bush embraced trade and outsourcing policies that shipped 6 million American jobs out of the country?
Now it's p******** Obama you want to come out from hiding and speak out.

reply permalink parent Share
Quote Strike
Anonymous
Anonymous
note, attachments may take a moment to show up.
1
Anonymous
19 Sep 2011 4:18PM

Where is your proof and sources that Bush spent more then all pres. combined? You're whole premise is bullshit because I'm not a Bush supporter.

Where is your proof and sources that 10 mill. disappeared? It doesn't even compare tot he $500 mill. that disappeared with Solyndra (or went into Obama's bank account?).

The money (12 trillion is totally made up and incorrect) that was lost on investments and home values was caused when Barney Frank & Maxine Waters forced Fannie Mae & Fredie Mac and lenders to loan billions to unqualified low income borrowers. It was one of the first things that happend when the democrats took over Congress during the last Bush years. So you're factually incorrect and should quit getting your data from partisans like MSNBC & Media Whores... I mean Media Matters.

Where are your facts and sources that Bush incurred 10 trillion in debt?

What outsourcing polices are you speaking of? What are your sources?

See folks, once again this is the difference between democrats/socialists and conservatives. Conservatives post FACTS, then they back up the FACTS with the SOURCES from where they're found. Liberals scream & whine and throw numbers out that they've made up which are totally false, thinking that conservatives are going to bite and actually debate them on false, corrupt info. Sorry failfags, try again.

The facts are that Obama has run the country into the ditch, just like Jimmy Carter did. Everyone that buys gas, groceries, tries to get a loan, or find a job knows it. Why? Because their big government, tax to death and spend the money policies DON'T WORK!!!

Ronald Reagan came in after Jimmy Carter & not only straightened out his messes, but his policies instituted the longest peacetime economic growth in American history (sources: New York Post, Fox News, ABC (20/20).

So now next year, because Obama has stuck with the same exact failed policies of Jimmy Carter to an even more disastrous end, he and the liberals in the US Senate will lose in a landslide.

reply permalink parent Share
Quote Strike
Anonymous
Anonymous
note, attachments may take a moment to show up.
1
Anonymous
19 Sep 2011 5:00PM

^And on top of all of that^ Reagan won the Cold War and defeated the Soviet Union with his "Peace Through Strength" initiative, & the Iranian hostages were released within hours of him taking office when Carter totally failed at it. Interest rates tumbled to single digits form a Carter high of 21% (I was able to buy my 1st house because of Pres. Reagan's policies), as well as inflation dropping and foreign investment in the USA peaking.

So thank you Obama, thank you Harry Reid, and thank you Nancy Pelosi, Maxine Waters & Barney Frank for putting us in the same disastrous situation we were in with Iip O'Neil and Jimmy Carter. Now we can have another Conservative ride in and clean up the mess you've made of the USA, just like Pres. Reagan did after Jimmy Failfag Carter!

reply permalink parent Share
Quote Strike
Anonymous
Anonymous
note, attachments may take a moment to show up.
1
Anonymous
19 Sep 2011 11:03AM

ok

reply permalink parent Share
Quote Strike
Anonymous
Anonymous
note, attachments may take a moment to show up.
1
Anonymous
19 Sep 2011 11:16PM

I find it funny that someone here actually claims conservatives post facts with sources. Dubious "facts" aside, I have never seen anyone here post sources, let alone conservatives with their bitch about obama programming.

reply permalink parent Share
Quote Strike
Anonymous
Anonymous
note, attachments may take a moment to show up.
1
Anonymous
20 Sep 2011 3:21AM

Maybe you find it "funny" because you haven't botheredto read them. Or more likely, as a liberal, you simply aren't able to understand them.

reply permalink parent Share
Quote Strike
Anonymous
Anonymous
note, attachments may take a moment to show up.
1
Anonymous
21 Sep 2011 1:30AM

So yet again you don't understand my post! LOL. Sorry, I can't help you with your lack of intellectual prowess.

I've responed to every rubbish post you've made with made up numbers and no facts to back them up. You can try to disparage both me and my posts, but they are backed up with known sources like the Wall Street Journal, CNN, ABC, Fox News, & etc. So any fair-minded person will accept them and reject your childish put-downs & unfounded accusations. In other words, grow up.

reply permalink parent Share
Quote Strike
Anonymous
Anonymous
note, attachments may take a moment to show up.
1
Anonymous
24 Sep 2011 4:05PM

I wonder which scandal will bring down the Obama Administration first?

Solyndra and the 4 other "green energy" scam companies, that Obama gave billions to after receiving campaign contributions?

"Fast & Furious" where government agents actually sold guns for profit to drug cartels in Mexico, resulting in the deaths of US border control personel?

Or Federal Agents twice raiding the Gibson guitar company for importing wood that every other guitar manufacturer also imports, simply because the CEO is a GOP supporter?

Obama = Corruption!

reply permalink parent Share
Quote Strike
Anonymous
Anonymous
note, attachments may take a moment to show up.
2
Anonymous
24 Sep 2011 7:46PM

If found true involvement, none. Do you remember Reagan Iran-Contra affair?

reply permalink parent Share
Quote Strike
Anonymous
Anonymous
note, attachments may take a moment to show up.
1
Anonymous
26 Sep 2011 2:05AM

LOL, typical liberals...don't address factual corruption that is happening right now with current tax dollars and the current Pres....

...make unproven shit up from the past that has nothing to do with it to try to divert attention away so we don't have to address it.

Nice try failfags, now why don't you address the 3 scandals that Obama has been caught in that are listed above?

reply permalink parent Share
Quote Strike
Anonymous
Anonymous
note, attachments may take a moment to show up.
1
Anonymous
27 Sep 2011 2:10AM

Iran Contra is now unproven according to this FUCKIN MORON.
All three of those scandals arent really scandals. Gibson guy became a tea idiot spokesperson after his house was raided, get your shit straight.
The p******** doesn't have direct control over the ATF. also, arent you guys in favor of guns for everyone? typical republitard failfags dont know anything about reality

reply permalink parent Share
Quote Strike
Anonymous
Anonymous
note, attachments may take a moment to show up.
1
Anonymous
28 Sep 2011 11:13PM

So you go back 30 years to find a conservative to bitch about, and I'm the fucking moron? You are the lamest failfag I've ever seen...trying to obfuscate (look it up, fucking moron) all the current liberal fail and scandals by making shit up about something that happened 30 years ago.

It came out in court that Iran Contra Reagan nor any Admin. top officials knew about it. Read a history book and get your own facts straight, shithead!

reply permalink parent Share
Quote Strike
Anonymous
Anonymous
note, attachments may take a moment to show up.
1
Anonymous
26 Sep 2011 10:16PM

Stimulus Plan 2012: DUMP OBAMA!

reply permalink parent Share
Quote Strike
Anonymous
Anonymous
note, attachments may take a moment to show up.
-8
Mrblackman
View posts View profile
26 Sep 2011 10:55PM

Pay attention to the news. I've have a better one, that makes more sense, dump the Tea Party!!!!!!!

reply permalink parent Share
Quote Strike
Anonymous
Anonymous
note, attachments may take a moment to show up.
1
Anonymous
28 Sep 2011 11:16PM

Yeah, the T.E.A. Party successes scares libtards like you to death, huh Blackman? This failfag Pres is going to be dumped next year and the Senate more then likely too. All thanks to democrats, repubs, and independants of the T.E.A. Party! Poor scared little liberal faggot, LMFAO!!

reply permalink parent Share
Quote Strike
Anonymous
Anonymous
note, attachments may take a moment to show up.
1
Anonymous
29 Sep 2011 12:18AM

It's not the TEA Party Stimulus that failed, IT'S OBAMA'S. It's not TEA Party $4/gal gas, IT'S OBAMA'S. It's not the TEA Party wasting $550 million on Solyndra, IT'S OBAMA. It's not the TEA Party that's been running guns into Mexico and getting US agents killed, IT'S OBAMA.

It's not the TEA Party that's going to be dumped in 2012, IT'S OBAMA.

reply permalink parent Share
Quote Strike
Anonymous
Anonymous
note, attachments may take a moment to show up.
1
Anonymous
30 Sep 2011 4:48AM

Just out today:

THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION HAS PUT THROUGH $1,000,000,000 (ONE BILLION!!!) IN NEW LOANS TO "GREEN ENERGY" COMPANIES LIKE SOLYNDRA AND THE OTHERS THAT HAVE ABSCONDED WITH TAXPAYER MONEY!!!

What's the definition of insanity? "Doing the same thing repeatedly & expecting a different result". This is why these fucktard liberals are going to be voted out next year. No doubt everyone of the new companies also contributed to crooked Obama's campaign too.

reply permalink parent Share
Quote Strike
Anonymous
Anonymous
note, attachments may take a moment to show up.
1
Anonymous
09 Oct 2011 4:21PM

Out this week:

E-mails and other communication has been released PROVING communication between Solyndra, The White House, The Justice Dept (Eric Holder), and Obama fundraisers Steven J. Spinner AND George B Kaiser (source: Washington Post). It's appearing more & more that these "green energy" companies are not only a cash cow for former V.P. Al Gore, but for Barak Obama himself. All the while the nut & berry ecofags who should be up in arms about this remain ignorant and silent.

With Eric Holder close to being indicted for lying to Congress over the embarrasing failure of "Fast & Furious" this White House appears to be heading into serious trouble.

(BTW not that brainwashed liberals will actually look and educate themselves, but here is a link: (http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/government-adviser-defends-solyndra-despite-ethics-agreement/2011/10/08/gIQAAAZNWL_story.html)

reply permalink parent Share
Quote Strike
Anonymous
Anonymous
note, attachments may take a moment to show up.
1
Anonymous
09 Oct 2011 6:05PM

Let's limit this to OP's post & the response under it.

I've noticed on thread after thread at Motherless that liberals or democrats or socialist, whatever you want to call them, never (and I mean I've never seen even one) prove a fact or a source, a name, nothing as being wrong. There's a lot of hyperbole, but never any proof to show that the Republican, or Conservative or whatever is wrong in what they post.

If you read this with the top two posts in consideration, every statement in those two posts have never been disputed. And I think, personally, that the democrats or liberals or whatever do actually hurt themselves by posting over and over and never even: a) Proving something is incorrect, or b) never doing what the Repubs or Conservatives or whatever in posting a fact then backing it up.

These are just my observations.

reply permalink parent Share
Quote Strike
Anonymous
Anonymous
note, attachments may take a moment to show up.
1
Anonymous
10 Oct 2011 1:27AM

I came to this.

reply permalink parent Share
Quote Strike
Anonymous
Anonymous
note, attachments may take a moment to show up.
1
Anonymous
12 Oct 2011 2:53PM

OUT THIS MORNING:

The Obama has funneled, now get this, ONE BILLION, TWO HUNDRED MILLION DOLLARS to a solar company called Sunpower (Source: American Live with Megyn Kelly). A company, btw, that European banks and investors have been issuing warnings about for months!

Meet the new liberal, same as the old liberal; tax, tax, tax, & waste & spend. If the "Fast & Furious" scandal doesn't get Obama & Holder, surely this scandal will!

BTW, Gov. Scott Walker has created 30,000 new jobs in THE PRIVATE SECTOR after busting the public employee unions in Wisconsin in the shitty Obama economy. There is no question that a Walker, Reagan, Kennedy economic strategy of low taxes & private indsutry solutions work, but liberals can't pull their heads out of socialist big government dogma enough to learn.

reply permalink parent Share
Quote Strike
Anonymous
Anonymous
note, attachments may take a moment to show up.
1
Anonymous
12 Oct 2011 6:09PM

You are going to have to come up with a better source then fox. It has been well documented for years that they misrepresent the facts or just outright lie to push their extremist christian conservative agenda.

You are aware though that bush increased the size of the federal government more then any other p******** in history right?

reply permalink parent Share
Quote Strike
Anonymous
Anonymous
note, attachments may take a moment to show up.
1
Anonymous
13 Oct 2011 5:37PM

LMAO, samefag liberal with no proof & no sources...just making bullshit up. Fox News actually has liberals AND conservatives on it as opposed to solid liberal spin on CNN, ABC, NBC, CBS, MSNBC, CNBC, PBS, & NPR...and democrats just can't stand it! LOL

Tell ya what you imbeclic ideologue (look it up), if you exposed your liberal pea-brain to something other then liberal dogma for once, you might actually learn something! Wow, what a concept!

reply permalink parent Share
Quote Strike
Anonymous
Anonymous
note, attachments may take a moment to show up.
1
Anonymous
17 Oct 2011 8:52PM

Reported on CNN, ABC, & Fox News that there is direct communication and links between Solyndra and the White House, which was denied earlier by spokesman Jay Carney and even Obama himself.

So in addition to the lies coming out of the White House there is also the fact that Obama got campaign contributions from Solyndra. This is the type of corrupt & dirty politics that makes us all distrust politicians. Obama = Samefag.

reply permalink parent Share
Quote Strike
Anonymous
Anonymous
note, attachments may take a moment to show up.