I'm sure they will prove inadequate to our right-wing brethren.
Replies 0
1
01 Jun 2012 3:25PM
You think the right wing will even read all of that then answer the whole thing? Betcha they're just going to cherry pick.
I supose I should also use this as a learning opprotunity to learn to use more .gov sites for sources. But like the right wings will accept anything other than right wing propaganda sites anywho.
Wisdom overcomes all ignorance if people learn it. Educate yourself, TYT and RT america on youtube.
1
01 Jun 2012 3:26PM
They (or he) will almost certainly respond with their (his) standard blather without addressing the particulars at all.
1
01 Jun 2012 4:50PM
LMAO!!!!!!
All these brainwashed Liberals can do is use "phone interviews" and far left hacks like Krugman to support their Looney-Left Socialist positions!
The guy starts his thread by saying "I never listen to News Corp".... in other words ...."I never listen to anything that disagree's with me!" THIS, ladies and gentlemen is where the term "brainwashed Liberal" comes from!
Moderates and Conservatives here post sources from left-wing media like CNN, ABC, CBS, New York Times, Washington Post, and yes....even MSNBC! Why don't Liberals use these sources? Because not even they support the Wacky-Leftists rants of Socialist tools like Zagg and ChrisPimpin.
It's been said over & over here:
IF YOU WANT TO BE TAKEN SERIOUSLY HERE, POST FACT, SUPPORT IT WITH PROOF, BACK IT UP WITH LEGITIMATE SOURCES!!! Leftists hacks like Media Matters, Paul Krugman, and "phone conversations" are not legitimate sources, DUH!
I guess this just tells us that Liberals points of view are simply illegitimate. What else do you expect when you believe and waste trillions on fairy tales like "green" energy, global warming, and "government stimulus". LOL, morons.
1
01 Jun 2012 5:55PM
I see the OP using a couple left wing CNN sources. So then by your intelect does that make that person a leftist? If I were to use the same, you would call me a libtard. Selective bitching perhaps?
ONE MORE THING! You just did what Zagg said you were going to do.
Wisdom overcomes all ignorance if people learn it. Educate yourself, TYT and RT america on youtube.
1
01 Jun 2012 5:25PM
Even with the excessive lenth of the Liberals post, there is not one thing in the entire lenth of that post that shows OP, his post, or the sources that he listed as being incorrect or untrue. As a matter of fact, after I read the Liberals post I was actually pissed that he wasted so much of my time with propaganda, unlike OP post which was to the point, and well sourced.
Mr. Zagg, would be better served if he was honest about his own compatriot's "blather".
1
01 Jun 2012 7:46PM
You need to learn how to read.
The OP posted saying that there was net gain under Walker.
The rebuttal post shows that there was a net loss under this same person.
1
01 Jun 2012 8:49PM
...and you need to learn how to be objective.
Someone can "SAY" whatever they want. The difference here is that Conservatives & moderates PROVE and BACK UP what they say & use non-partisan sources unlike Liberals like the post you're trying to defend.
1
02 Jun 2012 2:41AM
You site one "source" per item up there and they were all but one from news corporations. I replied to one item with seven sources. none of which were news related and three of them were federal statistic and reporting departments.
Just stop it now. You're making a fool of yourself. And you're obviously the OP of this and the other posts like it. And the same guy that just goes around insulting "liberals" in any possible post. I had the suspicion that it was you for a while but that "shellacking" comment you made clinched it. Seriously man, if this is your thing. Coming to a pron site to attempt changing minds while people are about to fap, then that's ...fine. I guess. But it's so easy to poke holes in you stories and watch you flounder, that you might want to curb your enthusiasm as it were.
Again, Seven solid sources to your one. It's shameful and you should feel shamed
1
02 Jun 2012 1:00PM
But they are all sources that don't agree with his view so they are leftist propaganda. Lol
1
02 Jun 2012 6:31PM
LMAO at how brainwashed Libtard's constantly whine and bitch about moderate posters sources, and then never post one, NOT A SINGLE ONE, to back up all of their Socialist hyperbole!
Please continue though....because you guys look like whiney fuckin' idiots, LOL!
1
02 Jun 2012 6:56PM
Two things are presented for ya right below cocksucker. Read and gain some knowledge..or is knowledge also socialist?
1
02 Jun 2012 7:07PM
Why don't you try to disprove any of OP's post, and do so factually, you big mouth? Rant, rave whine, and never any facts! The way of the Libtard.
1
02 Jun 2012 8:22PM
Stop referring to "OP" in third person. it's obviously you. You got "shellacked" in this very thread by me and you're trying to act as if it never happened. I stomped you and there you are posting frantic and in third person. Like anyone but you cares.
And BTW It would be..
"Why don't you try to disprove any of OP's post? And do so factually. You big mouth."
Not that run on sentence you posted in anger cause you got your ass whipped here in this thread. Ha-Ha
1
04 Jun 2012 4:45AM
After reading many of these posts, just because you Liberals answer your own posts, doesn't mean the rest of us do.
After the results democrats had in the last election after being such loud-mouthed cocky idiots, I think I'd find another term to use other then shillacked!
Since you seem obsessed in "winning" on this thread lets be clear. The only way for you to declare victory properly here is to.
1. Factually disprove OP's post with LEGITIMATE sources as so many have already posted here (which you haven't begun to do).
2. Back up your own posts with LEGITIMATE sources proving what you are saying just as OP and other moderates and Conservatives have done.
Declaring some sort of "victory" as you already have, and doing so prematurely, just makes you look like the imbecile that you obviously are.
1
03 Jun 2012 12:47PM
The main point of "the OP's" (your) post was factually disproven using analysis and providing government sources to back it up. Further, it was explained to you AGAIN in simple terms how it was disproven and how the sources are legitimate and credible. You claim you want liberals to provide sources but when they do, you ignore them and just start whining like a little bitch and repeating the same drivel you post again and again and again and again and again... ad infinitum.
1
04 Jun 2012 4:48AM
As you Libtards have been told over & over: PUT UP OR SHUT UP!
Quit trying to bullshit everybody by saying you've disproven OP. Post facts and do it! Back your facts up with legit sources.
Continued trolling, and not doing it just makes you Liberals look like fools.
1
04 Jun 2012 4:55AM
I love how democrats can never seem to muster posting a fact here, but they constantly steal from everyone else's posts with terms like "drivel", "blather", & etc. If Liberals can't be original in their posts, how does one expect them to have an original thought?
