Boards - soapbox - So yeah, another 9/11 post. Get out your pitchforks and torches, kids. I've been doing my own r

-6

Anonymous

@soapbox

22 Apr 2013 6:37PM

• 451 views • 4 attachments

So yeah, another 9/11 post. Get out your pitchforks and torches, kids.

I've been doing my own research, and listening to all sides (some of them batshit insane).

Truth be told, I honestly think that the planning for the WTC bombing had been going on for a lot more than we're told. The warning signs were there.

It seems likely that;

1: The terrorist organization responsible had been planting explosives at pre determined points within the buildings over a series of months. This obviously would take a while, as they would need to smuggle/obtain the parts of the explosives necessary bit by bit.

2: WTC was an obvious target, attacked once before by the Unibomber. Someone fell asleep behind their desk in Washington, because there's no way they could have missed this.

3: I'm not saying that the government had a hand in it, but their negligence definetly warrants questioning. Also, to me, it seems like it was the excuse 'Murika was waiting for to deploy MORE troops over to 'Stan and Iraq. You'll notice how, somehow some way, we always manage to get into another war with someone over there. Another war so someone can line their pockets more.

All that said, I'm no structural engineer. But FFS, anyone with half a brain and a little tiny bit of education can tell you the likeliness of 2 skyscrapers falling straight down one after another after having a plane slamming into them is highly improbable. Not without a little "help". And by help, I mean pre-planted explosives. Look up as many demolition videos as you want. I'll assume my point is made.

Picture: What actually happens when you slam a plane into a building that isn't rigged with explosives.

Discuss!

reply favorite add to gallery permalink Share

Copy

Replies 13

Anonymous

22 Apr 2013 6:43PM

oh shut the fuck up...it's history and we don't care.

was funny at the time though :)

reply permalink parent Share

Copy

Anonymous

22 Apr 2013 7:23PM

I won't comment on 9/11. However, I will say that bankers love wars. A war means a country will borrow lots of money. Basically, it's a gamble to bet on which side will win. Bankers instigated some wars, and were the reason some went on for far too long. They're basically the folks sitting behind the "guys in charge" saying "hey, that guy over there said you were a pussy / wanted to rape your daughter / insulted your patriotism / has lots of resources you could exploit ... you should kick his ass."

I put "guys in charge" in quotes, b/c today most powerful nations have central banks. And the central banks control the nations. They get together at their IMF (International Monetary Fund) parties to grouse about how to make more money, and funnel goods/commodities/labor around the world to make more money in up/down markets. They orchestrate market binges/collapses. They also talk about the nations they own as if they're pet guard dogs. EG: you threaten a US FED chairmen, he will talk about how he could weild the US military against you. There is no illusion about who is in charge. The folks printing all the money and controlling the markets are in charge. The folks with the most to gain from a war (by lending out money to countries going to war) are in charge. Everyone else thinking they live in a nation with a government that's in charge are simply delusional.

And, it's probably conspiracy theorist, but if you could push a terrorist organization to trigger a series of events that caused a nation to invade another nation and borrow billions from you ...there is a very heavy incentive to be immoral.

Likewise, the way our FED works, they print out $X dollars of paper ... it's nothing but paper ... in exchange for a bond from the gov't that says they will pay back $X in real value PLUS interest. That real value is basically taxes people pay on goods and services ... real value things ... that businesses and entrepreneurs make. We are in a debt-driven society. The Fed creats debt every time they print more cash, b/c the gov't has to pay it back with interest. It's a losing proposition. The only way to pay it back is to have an ever-growing GDP / economy, but our economy can only grow so much. Eventually it stagnates (esp. since the Fed controls it through QE) ... it's a losing game.

The government has always been a lapdog, and always will be as long as bankers are in charge.

reply permalink parent Share

Copy

-1

Anonymous

23 Apr 2013 3:01AM

NO, dude. Just NO. One if "they" already had the explosives planted. Then they would just bomb the fucking building. If you knew anything about large scale explosives you would know they don't just blow up from fire or heat like firecrackers or fireworks. They the big boy's require chemistry. Chemical, even Atomic reactions to work. The jet fuel inferno would in fact destroy the chemical bonds the kind of explosives needed to take down building's like that would use.

reply permalink parent Share

Copy

Anonymous

23 Apr 2013 3:18AM

The reason it look's controlled it's because it is. By gravity. The fuel was so vast it fell downward like a river of fire, fire so hot it melted the metal going from upwards to downwards the heat from this rised up and concentrated on the top floors melting them completely while severely compromising the downward floors. The outside materials are thicker steel than the floors trusses therefor when the top floors failed and feel onto via gravity the ones below like a stack of cards each time the floor pile got heavier destroying even the lower floors with ease. This amount of downward flow along with most of the supports gone ment the shell of the building needed only gravity to go straight down. Most of the collapse happened before we see the shell disappear.

reply permalink parent Share

Copy

Anonymous

23 Apr 2013 6:37AM

Not saying that their was a conspiracy outside of the jets causing the disaster, obvious. But gotta say you say that large scale explosives don't work with heat? Then what the fuck happened at the fertilizer plant last week? Seems a fire made the plant explode like a large scale fertilizer bomb. That actually needs to be looked into imho manslaughter charges against the owner for negligence. The plant should be able to be completely consumed in flames and still the fertilizer containers not explode.

reply permalink parent Share

Copy

-1

Anonymous

23 Apr 2013 6:50AM

That's because it wasn't the fertilizer. It was the 270 tons of ammonium nitrate they were hiding from the community, fire department, police, and homeland security. Not joking. They should be hung by their balls.

reply permalink parent Share

Copy

Anonymous

23 Apr 2013 3:54AM

as if knowing the absolute truth matters at this point. elvis could rise from the grave and confess, yet someone would always think more was involved. or find him to be as unbelievable. hell some people still think the bible is true. as pilate so profoundly muttered, 'what is fucking truth?' more importantly, what the fuck would you do with it? seriously, the question is asked on a daily basis here about skanky pussy, but, the truth is a whole new concept. the Truth. what would you do with it?

reply permalink parent Share

Copy