OP, please consider the following:
Starting a "war against religion" just makes it seem like the problem is rooted in political/ideological warfare (which is not), in which either side can be right and gives religious people arguments from which to defend themselves against anti-theist atheist, further spreading and solidifying their message and mentality.
All while making the members of a religious congregation feel threatened and insecure, ergo less likely to abandon their beliefs and probably turning to them for comfort, all while recruiting new members.
What you fail to realize is that people who believe in god don't do so out of simple stubbornness.
The world doesn't happen to revolve around you and, as it turns out, people aren't doing things for the sole sake of pissing you off.
The reality is that rather than simple opinion, there's an entire set of circumstances that has lead them to where they are made it so that they have intertwined their concept of god with their idea of feeling good (usually these circumstances spreading throughout their whole lives [Very hard lives by the way, which usually left very little idle time to consider the motive of things as they happen and bitch about it on a computer]).
They are perfectly capable of realizing their beliefs are irrational, but they won't because they have no reason to forsake their appeasing concept of god. You could argue that there are many negatives, but why would they listen to you?
When they were kids they were taught that they exist because of god. That if a meal was good, it was good's work. That if they wake up in the morning, it was god that made it happen.
Basic concepts like gratitude, gratification or comfort become deeply ingrained with these thoughts of god and suddenly, god himself becomes their comfort zone. They can even use this idea of god to block out pain, emotional or physical.
You could argue that simple observation of the world that surrounds them will make it impossible for them to fit a view of a traditional abrahamic deity in their world view, but those who actually proclaim their religion and take it seriously are usually living in a very religious, very closed environment which is constantly reaffirming their views of a world in which god exists.
And churches are not precisely public forums where people can discuss how bad their week has been, now are they?
So, they don't believe because they choose to. They believe because, to them, no other choice is possible, logical or even something they have considered at all.
Another thing, and a very primordial one at that, which you fail to realize is that by openly hating these people for simply believing in something which they barely had a choice in believing, you expose yourself as an opinionated, emotional and impulsive brat, and display (almost ironically) the same attitude that these people who you claim to hatred for.
"I can fix things if I just do this. If everyone just goes along with me on this, everything will be fine"
That's your own ego. Your own need to have control and be acknowledged.
That attitude is one of emotional decisions and hot-headedness; Of tribal thinking and limited imagination in dealing with the stress of every day life.
Although religion (by principle) indeed demeans humanity, you have to be an extremist egomaniac who is unable to admit that their entire worldview might be mistaken to assume you know how others should live their lives. It is this toxic mindset, which is frankly pathetic, that equally allows men to sink to the lowest bottoms of irrationality and has brought us gems like the crusades, the Korean wars and just about every instance of suicide-fucking-bombing.
Do I condone or even respect religion?
Fuck no! It's stupid as stupid gets, but opinionated self-righteousness in our statements as atheists won't do nothing for or against religion as an organized movement or an individual phenomenon.
However, I believe the study of religion from an anthropological, sociological and psychoanalytical, humanistic point of view will, as it discovers the hidden determinants and maps out the little intricacies of believe such lies.
Treating religion as a disorder, as a syndrome, as a complex phenomenon in the human culture.
And only through calm rationalization can you actually accomplish to changing some minds. If you actually expect that your little "imagined jihad" will do anything, then you are just as deluded as any religious person who think that what's in the inside of their minds can have an effect on objective reality.
Not that I actually believe a simpleton like you actually has the resources or the wits to start an organized and meaningful social movement; I'm just pointing out that your expressed desire to do so stems from a very close-minded, generalist and unproductive mindset, that will ultimately bear no fruits to your understanding or knowledge and it's comparable with the mindset of a typical religious fanatic; the only difference being that at least the dogmatic zealots were indoctrinated as a child into believing such rubbish unconditionally, where as you have no fucking excuse to having such a long pole so deep up inside your rectum.
Yes, the world is not ideal. No, you can't change what you don't like. No, there's no justice and nobody will listen to what you have to say.
Like I would say to a religious person who's arguing that their life has no purpose without god, or that they can't educate children without it, I'll say to you: Deal with it, you childish fucking twat.
Like you said, life is beautiful. Your proposition won't better it.
I say you quit your moronic day-dreaming and enjoy life in a peaceful way as possible.
TL;DR I disagree with you.
