The logo for Motherless obviously shows an underage child who also appears to be nude. As someone who is concerned about the children in our world village and morals in general, I urge Motherless to remove all such depictions on their website so that I won't have to report it & jepordize the website.
Replies 21
1
26 Feb 2012 8:01PM
All of what you're saying is completely made up. You have absolutely zero proof that the person portrayed in the motherless logo is a child or is nude. As is obviously demonstrated by the person on the right, the clothes color match the skin exactly so the person on the left could just as easily be fully clothed as be naked. There is no reference showing age on either person as their skin ton, wrinkles, amount of hair, age spots, etc are all identical they appear to be exactly the same age. While the person on the right is considerably taller with a larger bone structure it can be just as easily assumed that the person the left is unusually small or the person on the right is unusually large. There is no evidence they are mother and child either despite looking similar a lot of people look similar... The "woman" on the right has obviously been impaled by some form of beam and the person of unknown gender on the left is clearly attempting to remove the beam. Beyond that I see nothing indicating any connection between the two. The "woman" isn't even giving any indication they are female beyond that they appear to be wearing a skin tone dress but there is plenty of men who wear dresses and the "woman" is bizarrely flat chested and balding so is more likely to be a man in a dress.
1
26 Feb 2012 9:01PM
What would you say if I drew 2 stick people??And I just looked at it as a cheesy logo sheesh what do I know lol
1
27 Feb 2012 1:18AM
you could also argue that the logo means, no mothers and no kids.
1
27 Feb 2012 4:02AM
I don't normally say this.. But the op is a complete fuck tard for posting such rubbish!
Fox
1
27 Feb 2012 3:18PM
"I assumed the post was a satire."
OP here, and you sir assumed correctly. And as you can see, I even got a couple moralfags supporting me on that ridiculous post. It worry's me, if Motherless continues to delete posts of nude 23 year old actresses and fully clothed children and gives into these moralfag idiots, what will eventually happen to this site.
1
27 Feb 2012 9:12PM
I don’t like hypocracy and secretiveness and Motherless is ass full of it! Over the last couple of years their have been unanswered questions by Motherless members about the girl on the swing and other things like the “oops” screen that totally makes you have to re-enter the site, and now the Motherless logo in place of pics on the boards. One can only guess on what its all about and Motherless mods won’t tell, curious.
Some motherless members may not mind being led on a leash, I always wondered about the intelligence level of a Motherless member, but I noticed some were smart enough to leave the site saying their farewells on the boards. I never bothered to sighn up on this suspicious site, and it has proven to me not a mistake seeing as how this site has treated its members.
MOTHERLESS CARRIES ITSELF LIKE THE UNDERHANDED BEHAVIOR OF THE U.S. GOVERNMENT.
Curious.
1
27 Feb 2012 9:14PM
This is not my conspiracy theory, just some observations.
1
28 Feb 2012 2:16AM
Oh now that you specify satire... You never really know what some moral faggish douche containers would say. Great believable satire tho op
Fox
1
01 Mar 2012 9:44PM
If It read like any other sign , to me it reads No women or children. I'm puzzled that the icon is used. I would think they would use a sign showing the word morals slashed out.
