The point of those posts is not really to identify what people would do, but really just to identify someone the original poster thinks is hot and wants to share because he or she feels others might think the image is hot, too. lol. There's nothing uncreative about showing somebody a pic of someone you find attractive and saying "oh, do you think this person is hot??". lol.
Replies 8
2
02 Sep 2019 11:01AM
Than why not say exactly that instead? Why depend on someone to interpret your meaning in hopes of connecting?
1
04 Sep 2019 1:40AM
Yeah but don't you do that in real life (if you like women)? Show someone a pic and say "oh this person is hot don't you think so?" For men, this is a common conversation, even if you're someone like me who's more like Luke Skywalker than Han Solo. :)
1
04 Sep 2019 8:13AM
The only way your analogy works would be if you took said picture and walked down a crowded street and accosted every person you came across.
1
06 Sep 2019 12:04AM
hmm well this isn't a random street, this is motherless. hence it is appropriate in context. lol.
1
06 Sep 2019 9:58AM
Are you saying that if something is appropriate in motherless then it’s appropriate for a random street? You might wanna rethink that one hun. Or let us know when you are going to prove your theory so we can watch. Lol.
3
02 Sep 2019 5:06PM
isn't that "wwyd"-thing mainly about claiming to give others the permission to do whatever they like with some (claimed) privately known girl? it's as if to say "follow your impulses, feel free", I'd guess. nevertheless it is NO thrill for me because 1. well- it's not what i would call a conversation, those guys mostly don't seem to be interested in one and 2. especially those anonymously posted "wwyd"-pics seem to be 95% faked to me- a strange way of bragging. and why fantasizing with someone I don't know about some obviously here and there unknown web find? that's just too superficial and lame. (hope you don't mind my rusty english too much.)
