Motherless Boards Check out what all the fucked up fucks on Motherless are talking about.

I used to come here 10 times a day for daily fap updates of all kinds of good shit....now its worthless

couldn't agree more.

So where is the new spot?

I think admin. is still working out the bugs from the latest revamp. Let's give them the benefit of the doubt and let them straighten things out before abandoning ship.

absolutly right one week 3 new clips

give us a break guys. too quick to bite the hand that feeds you. we are doing massive upgrades and things will be working great in a day or so. we worked through countless bugs.. uploader will be fixed by tomorrow.

Agree with all the posts above...somebody posts a young girl with a bikini up her ass & all the do-gooders can't wait to scream "old!!!" Some girl whizzes and the pussy's scream, "Admin delete this shit". That's it whimps, let Big Brother do your thinking for you! Idiots.

dude.. we only delete illegal stuff. that includes pics of underage kids in sexual poses.. clothed or not. we have never claimed to host illegal shit, so back off.

Take it easy, Admin. It's a sad state of affairs when you live in a country where a PICTURE of someone who is CLOTHED can be considered illegal. The "Land of the Free", indeed.

re: I used to cum,
I used to cum 10 times a day,
Don cum here ....cuz u r now Motherless.

i don't make the laws man...

That's all I was trying to say to begin with when you got kind of bent, Admin. Although I do know of cartoon galleries that were deleted here at one time which were totally legal & available of all sorts of U.S. sites.

TOON drawings of children in sexual situations is illegal too man. i think its crazy that a pencil and paper can create something illegal.. but its true man. anyway, we try hard to keep the edge on this site sharp. (http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/28319199/)

random image/movie button is fixed. movie upload will be done by tomorrow.

This is the problem, Admin. The comment about clothed people posing is debatable, but toon drawings are not in any way illegal. I have a copy of the Supreme Court ruling and I am happy to send it to the mods here to review it, if you can tell me what the proper addy is to send it to. Of lesser import is the fact that hundreds of thousands of US sites not only have, but SPECIALIZE in this type of hentai, & when was the last court case you heard of for someone looking at cartoons? I agree with you, having an "edge" to this site is what would keep it flourishing.

Don't see a link. I will send over the info to you tonight or tomorrow.

i think that dude got canned cause apart from the drawings, he had real life pics of old.. plus he had a record on exactly that.. the court ruled that cause they wanted to make an example of him and a zero tolerance policy... plus he used a public computer at a state operated place.. lolz.. smart dude..

but i doubt that if they catch someone with a bunch of drawings and toons, they would send him to jail.. probably just call him a sicko and a perv, and move on..

my 2 cents..

its still a fucking law.

Jesus guys give the mods a fuckin break. Ask the question, Is there a more diverse site out there than this? answer: no.
The law is the law, dewez and heads can do fuck all about that so give them some fucking support.
Or piss off to xvideos or any other pornsearch. You won't get half of what you get here.

I think we all need to take a step back and look at the reality of the situation.

The admins and mods allow anything and everything that is legal to be uploaded, linked, posted, and streamed on this site.
They remove all content that is deemed ilegal, they dont personally decide what is ilegal. They follow the basic laws that were put in place by the country/state that the sites servers reside in.
There personal, moral ideas and beleifs dont play a role in this at all. They are only doing the minium to protect not only them selevs but you.
If any of you had any idea the amount of work and effort they put in to try to create the best possibly site out there. And they have.

This site is not runned by a 12 year old in his mother basement, they dont make up the rules as they go alone. There are technical and specific laws regarding each sec of our (the usa's) govt. They are required to follow them
All sites hav bugs, and to be honest if your not willing to wait a week for some bugs to be fixed, and you so fast to jump the gun or if you come to motherless trolling around for ilegal content then maby this is not the place for you.

But--If you want the most cutting edge hardcore diverselegal site, where you dont have to worry about drama or getting in trouble, and still view all that is legal then wellcome to ur new home. Not to mention, that this site has features that NO other porn site or image uploading site provides. The minor fact that the admins and mods are hands on and talk to the memebers of the site cool.

Oh dear are the pedos all pissed off because there kiddie pics keep getting deleted lol, good, can you now give out there IP address so i can personally rid them from the site and the planet for good!

This idiot above is exactly what I was talking about in my early post...tough guy calling people names cowering behind his keyboard, LOL. Anyway Admin, I found this and it is actually has more references to it than the reference that I was going to send you originally referring to "virtual" or "computer generated" porn:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Williams

I thought I would post this here so everyone could read it (although many like the dink above revel in being ignorant) rather than just emailing it to you. The actual decision that I was referring to dealt specifically & only with CG/3D porn. I can post that one to if you'd like. I hope this helps.

OK, I'll type R-E-A-L slow for you. Do you see the column over to the right on the link? The one with the hotlinks for the ACTUAL SUPREME COURT DECISIONS??? Next time try reading it before you type something stupid, ok?

The Wikipedia article is incorrect, as is often the case. In the matter of U.S. vs Williams, the case cited, the U.S. Supreme court ruled:

Justice Antonin Scalia, writing for a seven-Justice majority, held that the statute, the Protect Act, was not overly broad as written. Justice Scalia noted specifically that offers to engage in illegal transactions are categorically excluded from First Amendment protection, and he characterized the speech of an individual claiming to be in possession of child pornography in this category of unprotected speech. He also stated that the law did not violate Due Process because its requirements were clear and could be understood by courts, juries and potential violators. Justice David Souter filed the only dissenting opinion, in which Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg joined.

Decision: 7 votes for United States, 2 vote(s) against

In the case of drawn or CGI child pornography, the U.S. Fourth Court of Appeals ruled in December,2008, that, in the matter of U.S. vs Whorley:

Two judges rejected those arguments that "cartoons" or CGI child pornography are protected areas of free speech, reaffirming Whorley's conviction. A third agreed with Whorley on those issues but joined the majority in affirming his convictions on the counts pertaining to photographs.

The findings: Section 1466A(a)(1) clearly prohibits an obscene photographic depiction of an actual minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct; it also criminalizes receipt of "a visual depiction of any kind, including a drawing, cartoon, sculpture, or painting," that "depicts a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct" and is obscene. Section 1466A(c), moreover, unambiguously states that "[i]t is not a required element of any offense under this section that the minor depicted actually exist." 18 U.S.C. [section]1466A(c).

Judge Paul V. Niemeyer noted in the majority opinion that the statute under which Whorley was convicted, the PROTECT Act of 2003, clearly states that "it is not a required element of any offense under this section that the minor depicted actually exists."

This will probably be heard by the Supreme Court, but has not yet been submitted by Whorley's attorneys.

Dewes is entirely correct.

Well, typing slowly for morons doesn't seem to help. Again...look over to the right of the wiki page and you can access the actual Supreme Court documents. THAT is what the poster was trying to show...now, for the love of God, do you people finally get it???

I've read the Supreme Court transcripts, majority opinion, and dissenting opinion. I've also read the 4th Circuit transcripts. The 4th Circuit dealt specifically with cartoon/CGI porn. Williams did not.

Williams dealt with pandering, or providing links to child porn content.

God damn people, what's with the attacks on the admin of the site? He produced this great site, and he has done nothing wrong. He has to obey the law, end of story, otherwise Motherless would be shut down and he would be held accountable.

And if the admin is reading this, can you add the ability to sort videos by number of favorites a video received from users? That would be great, thanks.

I agree. I really believe that Admin is doing the best that anybody could possibly do. Motherless is being used (abused) by a small percentage of viewers, probably less than ten, who could care less if the site survives. It always follows a pattern of one individual posting, followed in a very short time by the others. I can't help but believe that are egged on by conversations in the chat room. I bet that if more attention was paid to the links talked about in the chat room, you'd be able to figure out what's going on and stop it.

Once again, Admin is doing the very best they can, and I support them.

Madcamel fixed the uploader. thanks for the support guys.

This Dwight guy that got 20 yrs for toon porn got his ass kicked because he had actual old on the computer too. They made an example of him and in doing so they insulted a large section of the Japanese publishing world. America is becoming so repressed and conservative and Russia is becoming a little more open every day, do you think one day they will call russia the land of the free and the US a dictatorship? Too late, that day is around the corner.

i don't think this site is boring at all.

Nothing boring about Motherless at all. There's usually something on here for everyone. The only problem is that I spend way too much time on it...hell, I've found fetishes on this site that I didn't have a clue existed. I mean, licking cum out of a woman's ass then spitting it into the mouth of someone else- I couldn't do it, but if people enjoy it, what the hell. The only thing I really don't get is scat. What the fuck do you do to hide the stink?

just a thought; how do you guys know things are illegal unless you are looking at them as well?

if you are operating a site and its your job to review and remove illegal content- its not illegal to screen it. (as long as you're not saving a copy)

Guys, stop bitching and moaning about them taking down teen (11-16) videos. There's much better stuff than that on this site.

So stop bitching about them taking down old. Idiots.

Personally, I think the mods here are pretty lax in what they allow. There are plenty of vids with pretty young girls dancing and shit like that which doesn't get deleted. If young girls is what you fap to, then there's still PLENTY here, it's just not the hardcore illegal shit that would get poor Dewez thrown in federal-pound-me-in-the-ass-prison.

I think you're doing just fine dewez. I HATE porn sites, personally. I find them all lame and boring as shit and completely a waste of time. Except for this one. This is the ONLY porn site I frequent. If I go to another one, it's to look for freely available content that I could upload here. This site doesn't suck, unlike all the others.

I agree,admins are doin a great job,have a great site and most people don't understand the work involved.Some things will fall through the cracks but for the most part admins do a good job of policing the site.They also have the right to remove any content,if it's even questionable.Can't fault them for covering their own asses. Keep up the good work!

The thing is is they don't take them all down because most of the stickam vids are girls are under 15 years old yet they are not removed????

Isn't bestiality illegal too?

Could all or any of these pics or this vid be considered illegal???

the only ones that seem to be bitching is the pedo's and who wants them here anyways. i say is they get caught with a kid cut there nuts off