A. your a fuckin dude
B. there are tons of white channels msnbc, foxnews, ect...
C. Your a racist piece of shit the blacks get one channel and your mad smh
1
27 Dec 2011 12:14AM
Replies 0
1
27 Dec 2011 12:24AM
Do you see and fucking white only commercials? I dont think so.
1
27 Dec 2011 12:48AM
OP here... You are a fucking joke all those channels you mentioned are NOT white ONLY. MY point was that for example BET is basically BLACK ONLY. Get a fucking life and a clue my whole point was that you fucking morons fought to NOT be separated yet you all have to have your OWN BLACK ONLY SHIT you are basically separating yourselves and you HAD fought to not have that shit moron. Oh by the way fuck off for saying I am a guy you probably WISH I was so you could suck my dick if I was asshole.
1
27 Dec 2011 3:30AM
OP here... I did want to add also that your comment about "white only" channels and then giving the example of specific ones like MSNBC & FOXNEWS shows you are a moron. Take a look at WHO is behind MSNBC for example: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3080263/ns/msnbc_tv-about_msnbc_tv/t/meet-faces-msnbc-tv/#.TvmAePKGBP4 You will see there ARE BLACK people behind MSNBC, and the same thing for FOXNEWS. They are NOT "WHITE ONLY" shows you retard. They report on everything as well, NOT ONLY "white news".
1
27 Dec 2011 1:01AM
Regarding your argument:
A. "your a fuckin dude"
B. "there are tons of white channels msnbc, foxnews, ect..."
C. "Your a racist piece of shit the blacks get one channel and your mad smh"
A. That's an ad hominem argument in its purest form.
B. "Tons of white channels" are nothing of the sort. The "channels" you cited are not white, black, purple, or green. The BET is exclusively BLACK.
C. Another "ad hominem" attack, which means simply, you did not present any FACTS to support your argument.
In summary, if you disagree with someone's position on a topic but have no facts to support your position, then do everyone a favor and STFU.
